Translation question for Matt. 9:2--the paralyzed man brought to Jesus

My question concerns the NRSV and Matthew 9:2.  In the Greek and in the other English editions that I consulted, the words "to him" are included.  This makes clear that the companions of the paralyzed man are bringing him to Jesus in the hopes of a miracle.  This then makes sense of what follows when Jesus credits their action as based on faith.  However, the NRSV omits the "to him" and seems to go out of its way to make it sound as if the encounter between Jesus and the paralyzed man was mere happenstance.  This makes the claim of faith that follows inappropriate.  I was wondering why the

Translation issues in Job 13:15

Job 13:15 in the KJV reads:  "Though he slay me, yet will I trust in him."  The same verse in the NRSV reads: "See, he will kill me; I have no hope."  The sentiment of the first is the polar opposite of the second.  Which is the better translation?

Two Johns?

Is John the Theologian - of Isle of Patmos fame, who wrote Revelation, one and the same person as John the Evangelist, John the gospel writer, or are these two different Johns?

The Grace of God?

The quote, "There, but for the Grace of God, go I" has bothered me for a long time.  The phrase seems to imply that God's grace is with me, but not with the unfortunate person whose life and circumstances occasion the comment. Does that phrase have any biblical basis, either directly in the text or in the implied theology?

Is the Bible true?

It brings a smile to some faces to hear the line: "Everything in the Bible is true, and some of it actually happened." Others find that line irreverent. How much of what is recorded in the Bible actually happened as it is written?

LITERACY

UNDERSTANDING

DIALOGUE

Massachusetts Bible Society Logo

Exploring the Bible Logo