June 8 -- The Tax Man

Passages: Genesis 12:1-9, Psalm 33:1-12, Romans 4:13-25, Matthew 9:9-13, 18-26

Many believe St. Matthew, the tax collector in today's passage, is also the author of the Gospel of Matthew, but many scholars hold this improbable and date the Gospel forty to sixty years after the death of Jesus.

In Matthew 9.9 we have the calling of Matthew; Jesus takes the tax collector as a disciple and eats dinner at his house with other tax collectors and "sinners." When he is questioned by the Pharisees about the company he keeps, Jesus says, "For I have come to call not the righteous but sinners" (Mt. 9.13). Jesus is always siding with the underdogs, those who are marginalized and the oppressed, and even shows them blatant favoritism at time to other social groups. Although Jesus' teachings and sacrifice is for all people, his ministry certainly focuses on and favors the poor, needy and outcast. But this is what makes the tax collector such an interesting figure in Jesus' ministry -- they aren't "the little guy." Not only are they materially comfortable, but they also work hand-in-hand with the Roman occupation.

Nobody likes the IRS, especially when taxes are taking food off your table. But in the first century Judea, the disdain for tax collectors went far beyond economics. Tax collectors were traitors, Jews who not only accepted Roman occupation but enabled and supported it. Furthermore, the way tax collectors made money was by collecting additional money than what was required. This was not necessarily corruption -- Rome expected this from its collectors. So when John the Baptist instructs tax collectors to "collect no more than you are required to" (Lk. 3.13) he is asking them to essentially work without wages. To most Jews living under Roman rule, tax collectors were traitors and extortionists, one of the worst kinds of people.

Jesus reaches out to the tax collectors precisely because they are ostracized by their communities, especially by the religious order that saw close cooperation with Gentiles as straying from their religious identities. They are unique from lepers, prostitutes, the disabled, and other marginalized groups Jesus ministers to because tax collectors occupy a certain level of privilege and have power that these other groups do not. However, as a disciple Jesus expects Matthew to open his homes to all kinds of "sinners" and to sacrifice what privilege he has for the sake of others.

There are lots of people in the modern world who occupy comfortable positions of privilege and are active and willing participants in a system that oppresses and hurts others. The tax man serves as an archetype for the middle class who "sell out" to this system and cooperate with imperialism. It's comforting to know that there is a special place in Jesus' teachings and ministry that serve people like the tax collectors: people struggling with their conscience and own identity, and that Jesus even invites them into his closest circle.

God and Mammon

Passages: Isaiah 49:8-16, Psalm 131, 1 Corinthians 4:1-5, Matthew 6:24-34.

Roman coin of Augustus, circulated at the turn of the 1st century AD

No one can serve two masters; for a slave will either hate the one and love the other, or be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth. ²⁵ Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? … But strive first for the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. ³⁴ So do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will bring worries of its own. Today's trouble is enough for today. –Matthew 6:24-25, 33-34

In a modern society that demands investment for retirement, a society driven by money and wealth (mammon), these are challenging words delivered by Jesus in the Sermon of the Mount. These words represent a significant shift from the Hebrew Scripture themes of wealth, which often emphasizes wealth as a blessing from God and, through the prophets, continually called for the just distribution of that wealth. However, in the Jewish confrontation with the Roman Empire, there is a drastic shift in the way wealth is both viewed and quantified. Before the Roman occupation, wealth was conceived in terms of land, livestock and harvest, but Roman economics and currencies changed the financial landscape and, predictably, attitudes toward wealth. Jesus, in this passage and several others in all four Gospels, warns of money as an obstacle to salvation and knowing God. The two are put at odds; mammon is not a gift from God, but is antithetical to the Kingdom of God – No one can serve two masters.

Obviously people cannot survive unless their material needs are met. Globally, billions of people live on less than $2 a day and millions die every year from causes directly related to that poverty, mainly starvation, lack of sanitary water and preventable diseases. Jesus, in the tradition of the prophets, calls those with the capacity to help these neighbors to do so with care and compassion. Today’s lection is not an outright dismissal of material ministry, or a denial of material necessities.

Too often passages such as the one preceding today’s lection in the Sermon on the Mount – “store up for yourselves treasure in heaven, where neither moth nor rust consumes” (Mt. 6.20) – are used to spiritualize Jesus’ message entirely and distract from the material ministries. Here, Jesus is addressing wealth as a master, something that consumes and enslaves you. In fact, Jesus is trying to quell the anxiety about self-preservation that prevents them from being good stewards to their neighbor and therefore poor servants of God. For when you are caught up in a selfish desire for security, and do not trust God to provide for you when doing God’s work, you are serving the interest of mammon.

Matthew 6.25-33 is also found in Luke 12.22-31, almost word for word (this is the part from “do not worry about your life” to “strive for the kingdom first”). Both times it immediately follows a warning about the consuming effects of wealth and greed. In Matthew it follows the famous teaching “no one can serve two masters,” and in Luke it follows the parable of the rich fool (Lk. 12.13-21) which tells of a man whose land produced abundantly, and in this abundance decided to build a larger barn and enjoy the security of many years of ample goods. But God tells the man: “You fool! This very night your life is being demanded of you. And the things you have prepared, whose will they be?” (Lk. 12.20).

The teaching “Do not worry,” is a fitting teaching to follow the parable. The rich fool hoarded his goods and did not share his harvest with the hungry, choosing to bask in his security and “relax, eat, drink, be merry” (Lk. 12.19). He allowed his anxiety about the future to overcome his trust in God and obligation to the community to share his abundance. He literally stored up his treasure for himself, but “was not rich toward God” (Lk. 12.21). In Luke, unlike in Matthew, Jesus expands on this teaching and describes what it means to be rich toward God: “Sell your possessions, and give alms. Make purses for yourselves that do not wear out, an unfailing treasure in heaven, where no thief comes near and no moth destroys. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also” (Lk. 12.33-34).

This is challenging to us in modern society, when investments (particularly for retirement) and saving is so heavily emphasized and encouraged. I do not think Jesus is calling for us to ignore the need to prepare for tomorrow, but rather warning of the peril of wealth. It has a consuming nature, and in putting our trust in our savings we are prevented from doing God’s work and ministry on Earth. The economy of Rome – the economy of empire – has prevailed for the past two thousand years, and the idea of wealth as currency has increased and solidified. This makes the New Testament shift in emphasis on money as “the root of all kinds of evil” (1 Timothy 6.10) even more applicable today then when first spoke. The pressure to serve mammon is even greater, and is perhaps an even more cruel and powerful master than in the first century.

May 11 -- Day of Pentecost

Passages: Acts 2:1-21, Psalm 104:24-35, 1 Corinthians 12:3-13, John 20:19-23

All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other languages, as the Spirit gave them ability. ⁵ Now there were devout Jews from every nation under heaven living in Jerusalem. ⁶ And at this sound the crowd gathered and was bewildered, because each one heard them speaking in the native language of each. ⁷ Amazed and astonished, they asked, "Are not all these who are speaking Galileans? ⁸ And how is it that we hear, each of us, in our own native language? … ¹² All were amazed and perplexed, saying to one another, "What does this mean?" ¹³ But others sneered and said, "They are filled with new wine." Acts 2:4-13 (NRSV)

² For those who speak in a tongue do not speak to other people but to God; for nobody understands them, since they are speaking mysteries in the Spirit. ³ On the other hand, those who prophesy speak to other people for their upbuilding and encouragement and consolation. ⁴ Those who speak in a tongue build up themselves, but those who prophesy build up the church. ⁵ Now I would like all of you to speak in tongues, but even more to prophesy. … ⁹ So with yourselves; if in a tongue you utter speech that is not intelligible, how will anyone know what is being said? For you will be speaking into the air … ¹¹ If then I do not know the meaning of a sound, I will be a foreigner to the speaker and the speaker a foreigner to me. 1 Corinthians 14:2-11

In Acts and 1 Corinthians we are presented with two different conceptions of what it means to “speak in tongues.” Acts recounts the event of the Pentecost, when the disciples are granted the gift of tongues to empower them in their ministry of the early church and live out the Great Commission (to make disciples of all nations). In Acts, the words the disciples speak are intelligible to many people in the crowd, whereas in Corinthians, Paul is describing a practice in the early church that closely resembles the “speaking in tongues” of many modern Pentecostal and Charismatic churches (“Charismatic” is a term for non-Pentecostal Christians who speak in tongues several times a year or identify as “Pentecostal” while belonging to a non-Pentecostal denomination, like Catholicism). Paul is accepting and encouraging of the practice, but expresses reservations about it. He attempts to downplay its importance in churches and as a sign of belief. These two practices, although sharing a common name (glossolalia), have crucial differences.

Two common interpretations of Acts 2 are: 1) the Disciples were given the ability to speak in previously unknown languages intelligibly, and 2) the Disciples were given the ability to speak in mysterious tongue and many of those present were granted to the power of interpretation and each heard this tongue in their own language simultaneously. The second interpretation seems the soundest to me based on a close reading of the text – in Acts 2.8 the crowd asks “How is it that we hear, each of us, in our own native language?” Also, in 2.13 it is mentioned that there are people present who do not understand and mock the Disciples, saying they had too much new wine. So, to bust out a Star Trek reference here, the Holy Spirit acts as a sort of “universal translator.” In the Star Trek world, everyone is capable of speaking in their own native language and be understood in the other person’s. This bridges the vast cultural differences between the different species, and makes the mission of exploration possible. Likewise, the Pentecost bridges the cultural barriers and makes it possible for the mission of the Apostles to be accomplished. It invites all nations to hear the message and be a part of the divine discussion.

This is a sharp contrast to what Paul says in First Corinthians 14.2: “For those who speak in a tongue do not speak to other people but to God; for nobody understands them, since they are speaking mysteries in the Spirit.” Paul, although not rejecting glossolalia, complains about how the practice is unintelligible to others in the church and therefore inferior to prophesy or other spiritual gifts that are communicable. Where the Pentecost brought understanding between foreigners, the unintelligible glossolalia of the early church created separations (according to Paul): “If then I do not know the meaning of a sound, I will be a foreigner to the speaker and the speaker a foreigner to me” (14.11).

Growing up in a congregational church, where the majority of worship is spent sitting still and listening to sermons or prayers, speaking in tongues is a foreign concept to me. However, Pentecostal and Charismatic worship is spreading rapidly all around the world (especially in Latin America, where even some Catholic services have a Charismatic worship style). It is a powerful religious experience for many people, one I wish to respect. Yet, it’s interesting that the debate Paul addressed almost two thousand years ago – about the value of speaking in tongues – continues today. Often, Pentecostals and Charismatics (often jointly referred to as “Renewalists”) point to Acts, and Hebrew Scripture passages like Joel (as Peter does in today’s lection) for the Biblical basis of their practice, while some non-Renewalists, point to passages from Paul to discredit it or relegate it to a private practice outside of worship, as Paul does in 1 Corinthians 14.18-19: “I thank God that I speak in tongues more than all of you; nevertheless, in church I would rather speak five words with my mind, in order to instruct others also, than ten thousand words in a tongue.”

However, those who use Paul to refute glossolalia are not being fair to the argument Paul presents in 1 Corinthians, and are rather picking out a few harsh sentences. Paul does indeed argue that it doesn’t have much of a place in worship if there isn’t a translator, but he doesn’t deny the experience either or call it gibberish. He ultimately concludes with, “So, my friends, be eager to prophesy, and do not forbid speaking in tongues; but all things should be done decently and in order” (1 Corinthians 14:39-40). On the day of Pentecost, I think it’s important for us to acknowledge that the New Testament itself has different conceptions of “speaking in tongues,” and that it has been a subject of controversy for the entire history of the Christian church.

Seventh Sunday of Easter -- Humble Resistance

Passages: Acts 1:6-14, Psalm 68:1-10, 32-35, 1 Peter 4:12-14, 5:6-11, John 17:1-11.

Humble yourselves, therefore, under God's mighty hand, that he may lift you up in due time. Cast all your anxiety on him because he cares for you. Be self-controlled and alert. Your enemy the devil prowls around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour. Resist him, standing firm in the faith, because you know that your brothers throughout the world are undergoing the same kind of sufferings. And the God of all grace, who called you to his eternal glory in Christ, after you have suffered a little while, will himself restore you and make you strong, firm and steadfast. –1 Peter 5:6-10

Our lectionary continues with the theme of suffering as part of the Christian experience. But what I find most interesting about the 1 Peter lection is the author’s mixture of two Christian virtues – humility and resistance. Often sacrifice and humility is conflated with submission and docility. Critics of Christianity have frequently said that Christianity encourages obedience to oppressive structures. However, 1 Peter calls Christians to be vigilant (alert and self-controlled) in the face of evil and to resist, standing firm in faith. Humility does not equal apathy, docility or social obedience; rather it is acknowledging the sovereignty of God and your place in God’s kingdom. This place is one of unity with others, who share your common lot, suffering for following Christ’s love and finding comfort in God’s grace and promise of restoration.

In 1 Peter, the author refers to “your enemy the devil.” In Greek, the language of the letter, dia,boloj means “accuser” or “slanderer,” and is how Early Christian writers referred to the Devil. The Hebrew Scriptures, such as the Book of Job, refer to the Devil as “ha-satan” or the adversary or even obstacle. The Early Christian encounter with the Roman Empire, and their perception of the Empire as morally bankrupt, yet immensely powerful, intensified their conception of evil and Satan. The Christian “Devil” has much more agency and power in the world in the Christian worldview than in the traditional Jewish worldview, in part because of Rome’s influence during Christianity’s formative years. Importantly, this gives Christian texts a strong sense of institutional and structural evil. 1 Peter’s warning is a warning against complacency to the culture and society Christians inhabit, a landscape where evil prowls like a hungry lion.

So the humility that Peter speaks of at the beginning of the passage is not a humility that is submissive to the culture one is in. Casting aside anxiety is not succumbing to apathy. It is quite the opposite. When you humble yourself before God, and align yourself with the glory of Christ, you find yourself in conflict with the world. You find yourself vulnerable, potential prey to a hungry lion. Fortunately, as today’s Psalm reminds us, “the God of Israel give power to his people” (68.35) – God gives us the power for humble resistance.

Fourth Sunday in Easter -- Taking up the Cross

Passages: Acts 2:42-47, Psalm 23, 1 Peter 2:19-25, John 10:1-10

“But if you suffer for doing good and you endure it, this is commendable before God. To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps.” 1 Peter 2.20-21

1 Peter reminds that doing the right thing is not always easy or safe. In fact, as Christians we are called to a life of suffering for our convictions. This message is easily lost in comfortable congregations; many Christians come to church to lay down their burdens and to ease the suffering of their lives. They are looking for stability and an anchor in life, not adversity or challenge. The rise of prosperity theology – charismatic preachers proclaiming that God rewards the faithful in this life with good health and financial well-being – demonstrates how many people are thirsty for a faith that will lift them up and ease their sorrow. But Christian prosperity comes in an unexpected and somewhat paradoxical way: We are called to suffer for our faith, but in that sacrifice find redemption and a "more excellent way."

Peter is careful to only commend suffering when it is on behalf of good. I also think Peter avoids glorifying suffering, although this less clear. Many have criticized Christianity for its self-sacrificial and need-denying obsession with suffering. Often in history, Christian monastics would subject themselves to physical pain and emotional tumult in an attempt to come closer to God in their profound suffering. Yet that suffering was brought deliberately upon themselves. Although they were searching for a deeper faith, they were not suffering on account of good deeds that they performed in the world. Often they were punishing themselves for their own sins, thus not enduring suffering for goodness, but for penance and purification. While a Christian theology that makes sense of suffering and persecution is indeed necessary and healthy, it is important to avoid masochism or glorifying suffering.

But it equally important not to have a theology that demonizes suffering. Not all suffering, at all times, is bad. Often secular morality focuses merely on alleviating suffering and raising comfort in the world -- which generally is a very good thing -- but finds itself conflicted when the seemingly "good" action requires great sacrifice and even more suffering than the alternatives. The example of the cross gives Christians courage in pursuing what is right even when the consequences seem grim and terrible. Few things frighten me more than the thought of torture. Yet my greatest moral teacher knew his fate and did not flee. He had the power to avoid crucifixion, but because of his mission suffered for the redemption and transformation of society.

In my last post, I explored how that although the church has prominently shaped mainstream culture, Christian ideals and values still remain counter cultural. For the first Christians, following Christ did mean persecution and violent suffering. It meant challenging the injustices and norms of society. Christ preached a message of justice for the poor and the corruption of wealth, a message of healing for the sick. Although in many modern societies religious tolerance is such that professing Christ won't induce a beating, I think that living Christ's example in the world will still lead to conflict with the status quo and bring the suffering and struggles that come with it.

Forty years ago Martin Luther King, Jr. was murdered for his commitment to justice and his prophetic profession in Christ. Before his murder, King had been beaten and imprisoned. But, knowing the consequences for speaking the truth and challenging his culture, he stood in the pulpit and asked men and women of all ages to join with him. He reminded Christians that the crown of our glory is made of thorns, that we are called to carry the cross like Christ. And through the torment, the jabs and insults, we are to display love and forgiveness, and be committed to peace. King understood how this process transformed society. The courage and restraint of protesters attacked by dogs or assaulted with hoses opened people's eyes and changed their hearts. It gave many others the courage to stand up for goodness, even when it means sacrifice and loss.

Because suffering was a reality of Christ's ministry in the world, it will also be a reality of the mission of the global church, the body of believers. Christ does not rescue us from suffering on the cross as a substitute -- he serves as an example of a more excellent way that transcends death. But although God calls us to endure trials on His behalf, he is always present and gives us the strength to endure. The great preacher Phillips Brooks once challenged his congregation by saying: "Pray not for easy lives -- Pray to be stronger men! Do not pray for tasks equal to your powers, but powers equal to your tasks." I have faith that the strength, endurance and comfort of the Lord will guide believers through their most difficult trials and tasks. As the famous Psalm from today's lectionary praises, "Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil, for you are with me; your rod and your staff, they comfort me."

March 30 -- Second Sunday of Easter

Passages: Acts 2:14, 22-32, Psalm 16, 1 Peter 1:3-9, John 20:19-31

I think it’s easy to read John 20.29, when Jesus tells Thomas, “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed,” as a direct message to the reader, who is presumably deciding whether to trust this account of Jesus’ life. Thomas is a historical disciple who actually got to see the Resurrected Christ – and feel his wounds – and we are those who have not. But I think we all have more in common with Thomas than is readily apparent. I know that, at times, I have felt the blessings of God very concretely in my life; there have been times when Christ’s presence has been easily recognizable. Like Thomas, at these moments – when we feel God’s presence tangibly and plainly – it is easy to put our trust in God. But, even though there have been times in my life when God’s presence was comprehensibly manifest, there have been many others that were far more mysterious and full of doubt. We are never permanently in the condition of Thomas feeling Jesus, nor are we permanently in a state of disbelief and doubt he felt before the appearance of Jesus.

This process has revealed itself to me in my life before. When I was an adolescent, a head injury sparked a muscle movement disorder. For three years – with varying degrees of intensity – my arms would jerk suddenly and my eyes would rapidly and uncontrollably blink. I had difficulty reading, writing and some days could barely perform simple tasks like getting dressed. Doctor’s struggled to find a diagnosis, and other teens at school often teased me and claimed I was faking my condition. But, as difficult and traumatic as the ordeal was, and as much as I would kick and scream if I was told I had to go back to those years, they have shaped my character and faith in a powerful and positive way. I do not look on those years with regret, wishing that I was able to have a “normal” high school experience (I have had many friends recount their high school years, and so far I’ve failed to meet someone with a “normal” adolescence – the age is almost defined by awkwardness). In the pain, and in the struggle, it was hard to see God at work. But I see it now. In fact, as I recount almost all of my trials in life, each one has its own redemption. Although they were far from crucifixions, the Easter story reminds us that great tragedy is followed by profound victory and renewal.

Yet, although I have seen this pattern in the life of Jesus – and to a smaller extent my own life – there continue to be times where I feel like Thomas; full of doubt and unable to believe in the redemption during the saddest of times. Although not as severe or debilitating as my high school head injury, this past week has also been a time of great trial and sadness (fittingly around Easter). In this situation, it is very hard for me to see what is necessary or redeeming about it – to have faith that there is a purpose to it. Friends and family of mine, whose opinions I respect and admire, have reminded me of the goodness, and indeed victory, that will come out of the situation. But part of me pushes against that, thinking I’ll only trust that good can come of this when it unambiguously reveals itself to me.

The words that Jesus tells Thomas, then, carry different meaning to me now. He says, “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.” In a way, this can be read as blessed are those who can, in the midst of doubt, confusion and even tragedy – the times where God’s work is mysterious and difficult to see – put their faith in God and the redemption that comes through the Lord. In the Greek, the word “blessed” is also easily translated as “happy” and “fortunate.” When a person can have faith that the trial they endure – and the loss that they feel – will be transformed and Resurrected, even before this event clearly appears, they are indeed fortunate. It’s not always easy to recognize God’s work in the world. Thankfully, the alive and Resurrected Christ is willing to bare his wounds, and proclaim his victory.

Palm Sunday -- Seeing Zechariah in the Triumphal Entry

Passages: Matthew 21:1-11 and Psalm 118:1-2, 19-29. See also: Zechariah 9 and 14.

Jesus enters Jerusalem

Seeing Zechariah:

Today’s lectionary presents us with Jesus’ “Triumphal Entry” into Jerusalem in Matthew 21. In the passage, onlookers laying their cloaks and branches down in front of the donkeys shout “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!” These words are found in our other lection for the day, Psalm 118. Also quoted in this passage is Zechariah 9.9: “See, your king comes to you, gentle and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.” By quoting Zechariah, the Gospel of Matthew draws attention to the scripture, and close examination of the text reveals other parallels between Zechariah and the Triumphal Entry. So much so, that I would suggest adding Zechariah 9 or 14 to the lectionary for this week (today’s liturgy omits the Old Testament and Epistle lection).

Zechariah is a prophetic text written after the First Temple period, and is the main Hebrew scriptural source for Matthew’s narration of Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem. Zechariah means “Yahweh has remembered,” and can be seen as a reminder to continue traditions from the first Temple period into this new era. Zechariah, although presented as one text, is commonly broken up into 1 Zechariah (ch. 1-8) and 2 Zechariah (9-14). 1 Zechariah visions a future of peace and prosperity for Israel, with an emphasis on the role of the priestly order. 2 Zechariah, on the other hand, is disillusioned with this priestly order, and puts forth a vision of peace and prosperity established by Yahweh himself. It is fitting then that the Gospel of Matthew, which depicts the priestly order of the Pharisees as calculated and corrupt, quotes from the beginning of 2 Zechariah, when Yahweh rides into Jerusalem “righteous and having salvation, gentle and riding on a donkey” (Zechariah 9.9 NIV).

There are two other powerful allusions to 2 Zechariah in “Triumphal Entry.” According to Matthew, Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem begins in “Bethpage on the Mount of Olives” (Mt. 21.1 NIV) the same place where the Lord arrives in Zechariah 14.4:“On that day his feet shall stand on the Mount of Olives” (NIV). Although not in our lectionary, Matthew’s account of Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem climaxes with Jesus expelling traders from the temple and turning over the money-changers tables (Interestingly, in the Gospel of Mark, Jesus visits the temple but takes no action, leaving and coming back later to “cleanse” the temple). This strongly echoes the final lines of 2 Zechariah: “And on that day there will no longer be a Canaanite (or merchant) in the house of the LORD Almighty” (Zechariah 14.21).

The Gospel of Matthew goes to great lengths to demonstrate Jesus’ continuity with the Hebrew scriptures and Jewish tradition, and today’s lectionary is no exception. Perhaps most confusing – but quite interesting – is that Matthew adds another donkey to the processional. Jesus asks his disciples to bring him a donkey with her colt (offspring) and then mysteriously rides “them” into town. Mark, which was written before Matthew and most scholars agree that the author of Matthew had access to Mark when compiling the Gospel, only has one donkey. So do the Gospels of John and Luke. But Matthew adds an additional donkey, and then says that he sat on “them.” Unless Jesus was a larger man than depicted in every single painting of him ever painted, this is a physical impossibility. Why would Matthew complicate the processional like this, especially when he has a source that tells him there is only one donkey in the processional? We can’t know for sure, but the most likely answer is because Matthew interprets two donkeys present in Zechariah 9, and wants the entry to fulfill the Zechariah prophecy to the letter. While the thought of the author of Matthew “fudging” the text to make it better fit a prophecy may be somewhat distressing, it does show us exactly how important Zechariah and exhibiting Jesus’ continuity with Hebrew Scriptures is.

Some paintings of the scene based on Matthew have Jesus riding the mother donkey, with her child following nearby. This is one way to reconcile the impossibility of Jesus riding both donkeys simultaneously, but the ambiguity should alert us to the highly formative role 2 Zechariah plays in the formation of our Palm Sunday narrative.

Sunday Dec. 2 -- Liturgical New Year

Passages:

Isaiah 2.1-5, Psalm 122, Romans 13.11-14, and Matthew 24.36-44. I will be dealing primarily with Isaiah and Romans.

My Take:

The first Sunday of Advent is the beginning of the liturgical calendar, so it is a sort of liturgical New Year’s Day. New Year’s is one of my favorite holidays because it is both reflective and forward-thinking. It anticipates the coming year, and puts forward resolutions. It’s fitting then that our lections for this week deal with prophecies for the future, and with regard to the New Testament lections, the second coming.

The second coming has always been the part of the New Testament that I struggle with most. Passages like Romans 13.11-14 have even affected my attitude toward Paul and the Epistles. It can be gathered from his writings that Paul believed that Christ would return in his lifetime to pass judgment and establish a new era. In this passage, Paul writes, “it is now the moment for you to wake from sleep. For salvation is nearer to us now than when we became believers; the night is far gone, the day is near.” The tone of this passage is one of impending collective judgment. This is not a personal passage – that as mortals each of our times are near – but one that has the presupposition that the entire world will face judgment soon. Seeing this assumption in his words 2,000 years later naturally casts doubt on his message.

His false belief that Christ’s historical return would happen soon affected a lot of Paul’s message, particularly his attitude toward children and marriage. Paul had almost nothing to say about children and their role in the Christian community and his attitude about marriage was that it is better to stay celibate (like him), but if you cannot control your urges, marriage is preferable to immorality (1 Corinthians 7.1-7). To Paul, there was little value in long term planning for the church and instituting how Christ’s message would be passed through the generations – it was important to get things right now, immediately, before it’s too late.

However, this opinion of Paul made too easy for me to dismiss the parts of his message I struggled with. I enjoy life – even through the roughest of times, I have always been thankful for the gift of life that God has afforded to me. It is not comforting to think the Apocolypse is right around the corner; or that this era would be wiped away “like a thief in the night” as the Matthew lection describes.

I prefer the message in Isaiah – the Kingdom of the Lord will be established slowly by obedience to God’s will. When we make God our highest priority (“established as the highest of mountains”) the world will begin a transformation where instruction flows forth from Zion and is accepted around the world – or, in New Testament terms, disciples are made of all nations. Isaiah’s vision of peace is promising, especially in a time of global warfare and strife: “they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.”

I think Isaiah’s message resonates stronger with many modern Christians because of their ability to influence society, and their missionary and activist spirit. In the 2,000 years since Christ’s sacrifice, the Christian community has had a long time to establish, formulate and grow the church. It now has a great deal of global influence, and it seems more optimistic to believe the church will play an active role in bringing about God’s kingdom than Christ suddenly returning on a cloud of glory and wiping the current society away.

Because of the “Left Behind” series, Christian movements that anticipate and fantasize about the Apocalypse have been put into the spotlight. Throughout Christian history there have been brothers and sisters who believe that their lifetime will see the Second Coming. And not to overly generalize, but they tend to be very dissatisfied with the spiritual state of the world. I mean, it stands to reason that if you pray for Christ to come, right now, and establish a new world, you must not like the current one very much.

Because I hope to have a long life serving God and helping better society, I’m partial to the lection of Isaiah. But, it’s important for me – as a Christian – to take the words of Paul and Matthew seriously. Judgment could be tomorrow, for all I know. This resonates on a personal level more than a cosmic level – I could die crossing the street. These really could be the last days of my life, and I shouldn’t take the future for granted.

With respect to personal action, Isaiah and Paul’s visions for the future are not as contradictory as they seem. The manner in which “Kingdom of God” is made manifest may be different, but the mandate to the individual is the same – obedience to God. If I work toward the peace in Isaiah, I will be ready for the judgment in Paul. Perhaps I will have a long life where I am afforded the social power to positively impact the world and “beat swords into plowshares,” or perhaps my end is around the corner, and “the day is near.” Either way, the message remains the same: “Let us then lay aside the works of darkness and put on the armor of light” (Romans 13.12) and “come, let us walk in the light of the LORD” (Isaiah 2.5).

Blog Introduction

This blog is intended to be a resource for all types of people seeking insight and exegesis into the week's Lectionary texts. I will post about one or more of the selected passages a week, with an emphasis on the ways the scriptures foster positive Christian practice and devotion. I hope this blog can serve as a resource for both lay people studying the Bible and for preachers/teachers preparing sermons or studies on the Lectionary. I intend to work two weeks or so ahead of the lectionary schedule, so that the following weeks scriptures will be available for people.

The Massachusetts Bible Society is "dedicated to biblical message of redemptive Hope, Compassion and Justice." It was the third Bible Society in the United States (following the Philadelphia Bible Society and Connecticut Bible Society) and was originally formed to disseminate religious texts and to aid the public in religious education. The methods of serving this mission have changed over two centuries (the horse drawn carriage handing out free Bibles is no longer in service...), but MBS remains an ecumenical organization dedicated to religious literacy. This lectionary resource hopes to serve that mission.

Comments are highly encouraged to help me tailor these posts to my audience. I am also available through email if you desire clarification or have additional questions. I intend on using the Revised Common Lectionary to select the weekly texts, and to work primarily with the New Revised Standard Version English translation. I will also consult the New International Version and the original Greek (for NT selections), but will only raise issues of translation if highly relevant or remotely interesting.

Thank you for reading this blog, and I pray you find it interesting and informative.

Peace.