June 1st -- Judgment and authenticity

Passages: Genesis 6:9-22; 7:24; 8:14-19, Psalm 46, Romans 1:16-17; 3:22b-28, Matthew 7:21-29

"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. On that day many will say to me, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many deeds of power in your name?' Then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; go away from me, you evildoers!’”—Matthew 7.21-23

In this passage, Jesus predicts that in the future, many people will profess faith in him but fail in doing the will of God. Although they may self-identify as followers of Jesus, Jesus explicitly states that this is not enough. This prophesy extends to today, and I believe Jesus would maintain that it’s not enough to simply attend church, be baptized and even pray on a daily basis. Doing things in the name of the Lord, and calling yourself a “Christian” is not a guarantee of doing things in accordance with God’s will.

In this passage, Jesus is talking about judgment and authenticity of faith. Although some Christian sects debate doctrine and renounce other sects’ validity, I think this passage makes clear that authenticity is not found along denominational lines. Today’s lection is fairly unambiguous that the labels we put on things – saying “Lord, Lord!” and doing deeds of power “in your name” – are not valid indicators of an authentic Christian heart. Fundamentalist, orthodox, progressive, liberationist; the differences in these theological movements are not trivial, but authenticity isn’t to be found in the labels.

So where then is authenticity found? I see two specific things that Jesus is valuing in this passage above acts of piety and confessions of faith: doing the Lord’s will and being in relationship with him. The first is obvious and explicit: “only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven” will enter the kingdom of heaven. Interestingly, Jesus does not equate the work of zealous followers – casting out demons and delivering prophesies – with doing the will of God. In fact, this quote immediately follows a warning against false prophets, who are “wolves in sheep’s clothing.” In this context, Jesus this passage can be seen as passing judgment on only those who insincerely claim to be religious leaders.

But I think this passage has implications for all followers of Christ, not just those who claim to be prophets and leaders. Jesus is making it clear that people can claim – and even believe – that they are doing things in his name when in fact those actions are in vain. Jesus emphasizes the importance of actually doing the Lord’s will as opposed to lip service, but discerning God’s will isn’t always easy, and there are many conflicting ideas about what exactly constitutes “God’s will.” In the passage, Jesus says he will declare to those who profess faith in the Lord but fail to do God’s will, “I never knew you.” While it is possible to interpret this differently, I think this statement implies a correlation between a relationship with Jesus and doing God’s will.

As a religious pluralist, I think it is possible to do God’s will and work in the world without being a Christian and professing faith in Christ. However, personally it is my understanding of the resurrected Christ who dwells in the heart of believers that I use to discern God’s will. My relationship with the living Christ is my compass for how I live out my faith, so the words “I never knew you; go away from me,” speak loudly to me. It is when I ignore this relationship with Christ that I stray most from God’s will.

However, in general I think the spirit of this passage is emphasizing sincerity and genuineness over actions and confessions. Earlier in the Sermon on the Mount (which this passage comes from) Jesus encourages the crowd to be discreet in their fasting and prayers, and avoid the public piety displayed by hypocrites who seek social approval over God’s (Mt. 6.5-18). Although a prophesy of judgment, at its heart I think this passage is a similar warning about the vice of religious posturing, which is almost always at the expense of genuinely seeking God.

Fourth Sunday in Easter -- Taking up the Cross

Passages: Acts 2:42-47, Psalm 23, 1 Peter 2:19-25, John 10:1-10

“But if you suffer for doing good and you endure it, this is commendable before God. To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps.” 1 Peter 2.20-21

1 Peter reminds that doing the right thing is not always easy or safe. In fact, as Christians we are called to a life of suffering for our convictions. This message is easily lost in comfortable congregations; many Christians come to church to lay down their burdens and to ease the suffering of their lives. They are looking for stability and an anchor in life, not adversity or challenge. The rise of prosperity theology – charismatic preachers proclaiming that God rewards the faithful in this life with good health and financial well-being – demonstrates how many people are thirsty for a faith that will lift them up and ease their sorrow. But Christian prosperity comes in an unexpected and somewhat paradoxical way: We are called to suffer for our faith, but in that sacrifice find redemption and a "more excellent way."

Peter is careful to only commend suffering when it is on behalf of good. I also think Peter avoids glorifying suffering, although this less clear. Many have criticized Christianity for its self-sacrificial and need-denying obsession with suffering. Often in history, Christian monastics would subject themselves to physical pain and emotional tumult in an attempt to come closer to God in their profound suffering. Yet that suffering was brought deliberately upon themselves. Although they were searching for a deeper faith, they were not suffering on account of good deeds that they performed in the world. Often they were punishing themselves for their own sins, thus not enduring suffering for goodness, but for penance and purification. While a Christian theology that makes sense of suffering and persecution is indeed necessary and healthy, it is important to avoid masochism or glorifying suffering.

But it equally important not to have a theology that demonizes suffering. Not all suffering, at all times, is bad. Often secular morality focuses merely on alleviating suffering and raising comfort in the world -- which generally is a very good thing -- but finds itself conflicted when the seemingly "good" action requires great sacrifice and even more suffering than the alternatives. The example of the cross gives Christians courage in pursuing what is right even when the consequences seem grim and terrible. Few things frighten me more than the thought of torture. Yet my greatest moral teacher knew his fate and did not flee. He had the power to avoid crucifixion, but because of his mission suffered for the redemption and transformation of society.

In my last post, I explored how that although the church has prominently shaped mainstream culture, Christian ideals and values still remain counter cultural. For the first Christians, following Christ did mean persecution and violent suffering. It meant challenging the injustices and norms of society. Christ preached a message of justice for the poor and the corruption of wealth, a message of healing for the sick. Although in many modern societies religious tolerance is such that professing Christ won't induce a beating, I think that living Christ's example in the world will still lead to conflict with the status quo and bring the suffering and struggles that come with it.

Forty years ago Martin Luther King, Jr. was murdered for his commitment to justice and his prophetic profession in Christ. Before his murder, King had been beaten and imprisoned. But, knowing the consequences for speaking the truth and challenging his culture, he stood in the pulpit and asked men and women of all ages to join with him. He reminded Christians that the crown of our glory is made of thorns, that we are called to carry the cross like Christ. And through the torment, the jabs and insults, we are to display love and forgiveness, and be committed to peace. King understood how this process transformed society. The courage and restraint of protesters attacked by dogs or assaulted with hoses opened people's eyes and changed their hearts. It gave many others the courage to stand up for goodness, even when it means sacrifice and loss.

Because suffering was a reality of Christ's ministry in the world, it will also be a reality of the mission of the global church, the body of believers. Christ does not rescue us from suffering on the cross as a substitute -- he serves as an example of a more excellent way that transcends death. But although God calls us to endure trials on His behalf, he is always present and gives us the strength to endure. The great preacher Phillips Brooks once challenged his congregation by saying: "Pray not for easy lives -- Pray to be stronger men! Do not pray for tasks equal to your powers, but powers equal to your tasks." I have faith that the strength, endurance and comfort of the Lord will guide believers through their most difficult trials and tasks. As the famous Psalm from today's lectionary praises, "Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil, for you are with me; your rod and your staff, they comfort me."

March 30 -- Second Sunday of Easter

Passages: Acts 2:14, 22-32, Psalm 16, 1 Peter 1:3-9, John 20:19-31

I think it’s easy to read John 20.29, when Jesus tells Thomas, “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed,” as a direct message to the reader, who is presumably deciding whether to trust this account of Jesus’ life. Thomas is a historical disciple who actually got to see the Resurrected Christ – and feel his wounds – and we are those who have not. But I think we all have more in common with Thomas than is readily apparent. I know that, at times, I have felt the blessings of God very concretely in my life; there have been times when Christ’s presence has been easily recognizable. Like Thomas, at these moments – when we feel God’s presence tangibly and plainly – it is easy to put our trust in God. But, even though there have been times in my life when God’s presence was comprehensibly manifest, there have been many others that were far more mysterious and full of doubt. We are never permanently in the condition of Thomas feeling Jesus, nor are we permanently in a state of disbelief and doubt he felt before the appearance of Jesus.

This process has revealed itself to me in my life before. When I was an adolescent, a head injury sparked a muscle movement disorder. For three years – with varying degrees of intensity – my arms would jerk suddenly and my eyes would rapidly and uncontrollably blink. I had difficulty reading, writing and some days could barely perform simple tasks like getting dressed. Doctor’s struggled to find a diagnosis, and other teens at school often teased me and claimed I was faking my condition. But, as difficult and traumatic as the ordeal was, and as much as I would kick and scream if I was told I had to go back to those years, they have shaped my character and faith in a powerful and positive way. I do not look on those years with regret, wishing that I was able to have a “normal” high school experience (I have had many friends recount their high school years, and so far I’ve failed to meet someone with a “normal” adolescence – the age is almost defined by awkwardness). In the pain, and in the struggle, it was hard to see God at work. But I see it now. In fact, as I recount almost all of my trials in life, each one has its own redemption. Although they were far from crucifixions, the Easter story reminds us that great tragedy is followed by profound victory and renewal.

Yet, although I have seen this pattern in the life of Jesus – and to a smaller extent my own life – there continue to be times where I feel like Thomas; full of doubt and unable to believe in the redemption during the saddest of times. Although not as severe or debilitating as my high school head injury, this past week has also been a time of great trial and sadness (fittingly around Easter). In this situation, it is very hard for me to see what is necessary or redeeming about it – to have faith that there is a purpose to it. Friends and family of mine, whose opinions I respect and admire, have reminded me of the goodness, and indeed victory, that will come out of the situation. But part of me pushes against that, thinking I’ll only trust that good can come of this when it unambiguously reveals itself to me.

The words that Jesus tells Thomas, then, carry different meaning to me now. He says, “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.” In a way, this can be read as blessed are those who can, in the midst of doubt, confusion and even tragedy – the times where God’s work is mysterious and difficult to see – put their faith in God and the redemption that comes through the Lord. In the Greek, the word “blessed” is also easily translated as “happy” and “fortunate.” When a person can have faith that the trial they endure – and the loss that they feel – will be transformed and Resurrected, even before this event clearly appears, they are indeed fortunate. It’s not always easy to recognize God’s work in the world. Thankfully, the alive and Resurrected Christ is willing to bare his wounds, and proclaim his victory.

Palm Sunday -- Seeing Zechariah in the Triumphal Entry

Passages: Matthew 21:1-11 and Psalm 118:1-2, 19-29. See also: Zechariah 9 and 14.

Jesus enters Jerusalem

Seeing Zechariah:

Today’s lectionary presents us with Jesus’ “Triumphal Entry” into Jerusalem in Matthew 21. In the passage, onlookers laying their cloaks and branches down in front of the donkeys shout “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!” These words are found in our other lection for the day, Psalm 118. Also quoted in this passage is Zechariah 9.9: “See, your king comes to you, gentle and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.” By quoting Zechariah, the Gospel of Matthew draws attention to the scripture, and close examination of the text reveals other parallels between Zechariah and the Triumphal Entry. So much so, that I would suggest adding Zechariah 9 or 14 to the lectionary for this week (today’s liturgy omits the Old Testament and Epistle lection).

Zechariah is a prophetic text written after the First Temple period, and is the main Hebrew scriptural source for Matthew’s narration of Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem. Zechariah means “Yahweh has remembered,” and can be seen as a reminder to continue traditions from the first Temple period into this new era. Zechariah, although presented as one text, is commonly broken up into 1 Zechariah (ch. 1-8) and 2 Zechariah (9-14). 1 Zechariah visions a future of peace and prosperity for Israel, with an emphasis on the role of the priestly order. 2 Zechariah, on the other hand, is disillusioned with this priestly order, and puts forth a vision of peace and prosperity established by Yahweh himself. It is fitting then that the Gospel of Matthew, which depicts the priestly order of the Pharisees as calculated and corrupt, quotes from the beginning of 2 Zechariah, when Yahweh rides into Jerusalem “righteous and having salvation, gentle and riding on a donkey” (Zechariah 9.9 NIV).

There are two other powerful allusions to 2 Zechariah in “Triumphal Entry.” According to Matthew, Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem begins in “Bethpage on the Mount of Olives” (Mt. 21.1 NIV) the same place where the Lord arrives in Zechariah 14.4:“On that day his feet shall stand on the Mount of Olives” (NIV). Although not in our lectionary, Matthew’s account of Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem climaxes with Jesus expelling traders from the temple and turning over the money-changers tables (Interestingly, in the Gospel of Mark, Jesus visits the temple but takes no action, leaving and coming back later to “cleanse” the temple). This strongly echoes the final lines of 2 Zechariah: “And on that day there will no longer be a Canaanite (or merchant) in the house of the LORD Almighty” (Zechariah 14.21).

The Gospel of Matthew goes to great lengths to demonstrate Jesus’ continuity with the Hebrew scriptures and Jewish tradition, and today’s lectionary is no exception. Perhaps most confusing – but quite interesting – is that Matthew adds another donkey to the processional. Jesus asks his disciples to bring him a donkey with her colt (offspring) and then mysteriously rides “them” into town. Mark, which was written before Matthew and most scholars agree that the author of Matthew had access to Mark when compiling the Gospel, only has one donkey. So do the Gospels of John and Luke. But Matthew adds an additional donkey, and then says that he sat on “them.” Unless Jesus was a larger man than depicted in every single painting of him ever painted, this is a physical impossibility. Why would Matthew complicate the processional like this, especially when he has a source that tells him there is only one donkey in the processional? We can’t know for sure, but the most likely answer is because Matthew interprets two donkeys present in Zechariah 9, and wants the entry to fulfill the Zechariah prophecy to the letter. While the thought of the author of Matthew “fudging” the text to make it better fit a prophecy may be somewhat distressing, it does show us exactly how important Zechariah and exhibiting Jesus’ continuity with Hebrew Scriptures is.

Some paintings of the scene based on Matthew have Jesus riding the mother donkey, with her child following nearby. This is one way to reconcile the impossibility of Jesus riding both donkeys simultaneously, but the ambiguity should alert us to the highly formative role 2 Zechariah plays in the formation of our Palm Sunday narrative.

Third Sunday in Lent -- Perseverance

Passages: Exodus 17:1-7, Psalm 95, Romans 5:1-11, John 4:5-42


"And we rejoice in the hope of the glory of God. Not only so, but we also rejoice in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not disappoint us, because God has poured out his love into our hearts by the Holy Spirit, whom he has given us." -- Romans 5:2-5

The Apostle Paul, imprisoned near the end of his life.

There is a certain danger in rationalizing suffering. It is important to see how God works in our lives, including our deepest trials, but it should not affect our sense of compassion and duty to each other when in need. Often, when Christians are faced with suffering they will either see God's wrath and punishment, or -- like Paul -- see God's blessings and how even the worst times can build up our character and faith. But we must also see the injustice of suffering, and act in accordance to the teachings and commandments of Christ.

Not all suffering is an injustice -- but all injustice causes suffering. There are certain agonies (the Greek word "agwn" or agon means a contest or struggle) that are a necessary part of life, and even a blessing as Paul suggests. But those tend to be the sufferings of the universal human condition: heartbreak, failure, sickness, injury and betrayals. These are all difficult parts of life, but part of its richness and wholeness. But there are sufferings that cannot be seen as blessings -- torture, rape and murder. Children dying from hunger or unsafe drinking water. The wholesale exploitation of human beings for greed and power.

True, even in the worst of human conditions (perhaps especially in the worst of human conditions) you can find great character and hope. The kind of hope that can only emerge the deepest of despairs. The Early Christians faced severe persecution and often gruesome, torturous treatment. Paul was beaten and arrested many times in his life, and is best known for his sense of mission and his perseverance (even more than his gift of pen and persuasion). And no doubt, Paul is able to write this inspiring passage because he knows first hand how his persecution has given him greater hope and connected him with the Holy Spirit. Yet these words were written to Christians during a time of persecution and limited power -- there was yet to be significant danger for the Early Christians to grow callous about the sufferings of others, or perpetuate systematic injustice against others.

Today, we are in a much different historical and social context. We must remember that these words come from the depths of persecution and social powerlessness. It was written to communities who were suffering together, and sharing hope for a better world through Christ together. It was meant to encourage them, and help them see how God continues to bless them even in these difficult times.

Two thousand years later, Christians still suffer and hope together. Paul's words resonate with them now as it did for the first Christians. But unlike the first Christians, the Church has great power and resources. We cannot let our understanding of suffering as a blessing -- and something that is part of God's plan for our lives -- dilute our mission of healing and compassion. We cannot pass the Samaritan on the road and not see someone in great distress.

Sunday, Dec. 23 -- The Nativity

Passages: Matthew 1:18-25, Romans 1:1-7, Psalm 80:1-7, 17-19, Isaiah 7:10-16.

Above: The familiar Nativity set
Below: Nativity scene based on Luke alone

If you look at the two pictures above, you will notice some striking dissimilarities (other than artistic quality). The top is the familiar Nativity set that is displayed in millions of homes and churches. It has everything you'd expect: Shepherds, Angels, Wise Men, animals, Mary, Joseph and, of course, the baby Jesus asleep in a manger. Many sets even have a star that hangs from the top of the stable. The painting below it is based on Luke, and is missing the three magi and the angels. But the wise men and the star of Bethlehem only appear in Matthew, not Luke. There are no Nativity paintings based solely on Matthew, because although the Gospel of Matthew delivers a birth narrative, there is no manger, shepherds, animals or even a minor description of where the birth took place (other than Bethlehem). The familiar Nativity scene crams the two accounts together, which is okay.

The disparity between Matthew's and Luke's choices for witnesses to Jesus' birth (wise men and shepherds, respectively), tell us a lot about their focuses. Luke goes to great lengths to show that Jesus, although divine and conceived through the Holy Spirit, came to us humble and poor. Jesus was born in a stable and placed in a manger. There was no special star for Jesus, no powerful rulers coming to pay homage, and no expensive gifts. The witnesses to this miracle were mere shepherds. Since shepherding required long hours outside, but was not rocket science, often the youngest son of a family was burdened with the task. Notice how young the two shepherds in the painting are. They are just kids! Luke is interested in exalting Jesus by showing how he came to the world humbly and in poverty.

Matthew isn't as interested in that. He doesn't depict Christ as born into privilege, but he doesn't stress it like Luke. Jesus' birth, in Matthew, changes the order of the cosmos. Astrologers from the East see the star and visit Christ and pay homage with expensive gifts. Jesus, instead of being an anonymous birth in a stable, is seen as a political threat to King Herod, who orders a massacre of infants to quell any challenge to his power. Like Moses, Jesus escapes a decree to kill infants from a paranoid tyrant and is taken to Egypt (of all places).

There is another significant disparity in the two birth narratives, one that involves today's lectionary. In the Matthew lection (1.18-25), we are given the account of an angel appearing to Joseph in a dream, exhorting him not to break his engagement with Mary. The passage is not in Luke. In Luke's account, Joseph never has to be convinced to stay with Mary. Furthermore, in Luke the angel's commandment to name the child Jesus is given to Mary, not Joseph. Joseph is actually a relatively minor character in the birth narrative, as Luke devotes quite a bit of time to Mary.

Luke does something unique in devoting so much detail and thought to the women in the story. It is very much in tune with his emphasis on the marginalized, on those with a lower status. In fact, the person with the highest status in Luke's account -- Zechariah, the husband of Elizabeth and a priest -- is struck mute. He regains his voice after the birth of his son, John the Baptist. In yet another reversal of power, relatives wanted to name John Zechariah after his father, but Elizabeth insisted upon the name John. Women are given a special power and attention in Luke's narrative, and it is important to note that.

Matthew tends to focus on the males in the story: Joseph, the wise men, and Herod. Angels appear to Joseph in his dreams three separate times: 1) to foretell Jesus' birth 2) to warn Joseph to flee to Egypt and 3) to tell Joseph it was safe to return to Israel. The commonplace details present in Luke are absent in Matthew. However, the bigger issues absent in Luke are stressed in Matthew. The Gospel of Luke makes no mention of the massacre of the infants or the escape to Egypt.

The two accounts are not incompatible -- as the familiar Nativity scene above demonstrates, it is easy two cram the accounts together and add some harmless details (there is no mention of how many wise men came to visit Jesus). But when reconcile the two birth narratives, we should not forget the differences and details that make them unique. We have four Gospels for a reason: one perspective wasn't nearly enough.

Sunday, Dec. 16 -- the Voice in the Desert

Passages: Isaiah 35:1-10, Psalm 146:5-10, James 5:7-10, and Matthew 11:2-11.

This picture reminds me of Sunday School. John the Baptist -- the Voice in the Desert.

What's in a question?:

Have you ever wondered why Jesus seldom answers a question directly? People will come to him, ask him something relatively straight-forward like “Should we pay taxes?” (Mt. 22.17), but never get a simple answer (“Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s” Mt. 22.21). In today’s Matthew lection, we get another example of a somewhat simple question: “Are you the one who was to come, or should we expect someone else” (Mt. 11.3)?

Jesus answers: “Go back and report to John what you hear and see: The blind receive sight, the lame walk, those who have leprosy are cured, the deaf hear, the dead are raised and the good news is preached to the poor” (Mt. 11.4-5). Instead of saying, “Yes I am,” which – to me – is the implied answer, Jesus compares his works to works found in various places in Isaiah (26.19;29.18; 42.7, 18; 61.1), including today’s Isaiah lection (32.5-6). Today’s Isaiah lection reads, “Then will the eyes of the blind be opened and the ears of the deaf unstopped. Then will the lame leap like a deer, and the mute tongue shout for joy.”

Why does he do this? I think it is because he wants to teach people about the scriptures and let them make the connections for themselves. Jesus did not come to dictate faith to people – he was a teacher. Jesus spoke in parables, not only so it would be easy to retell and pass on the stories, but so each person can find meaning in the narrative. Jesus was here for more than just answers – he had a message that was more profound than do and don’t; yes and no.

My roommate in undergrad used to ask me a lot of questions about philosophy, religion and politics (I was a philosophy major and opinion columnist for the university paper, and we were both people concerned with spiritual questions). Often, he would tease me about frequently answering questions, “yes and no…” and then immediately proceed into an explanation. Even though he joked about it, he also appreciated it. My answers revealed not only the answer, but how I arrived there. It also sparked a discussion. After all, he didn’t walk into my room and ask “Do you believe you can petition the Lord with prayer?” for a simple yes or no. He had his own ideas, and he wanted to know mine.

Jesus is so inspiring because, when people ask Jesus questions, he sees what is behind the question, what is on their minds. John’s disciples wanted to know if Jesus was the one John preached would come, if Jesus fulfilled Scripture. But they didn’t come just to see if Jesus was legit, but also if their teacher was correct in his prophecies. It is not a coincidence that Jesus assures the crowd that John is “the one about who is written: I will send my messenger ahead of you, who will prepare your way before you” (Mt. 11.10) as John’s disciples are leaving. In just a few verses after the lection ends, Jesus claims John is Elijah: “and if you are willing to accept it, he is Elijah who is to come. Let anyone with ears listen” (Mt. 11.14)! Without directly answering John’s disciples, he gives them what they long to hear, and they learn for themselves.

I am thankful that Jesus not only had answers, but was willing to teach them.

Sunday, Dec. 9 -- From the Stump of Jesse

Passages:
Isaiah 11:1-10, Psalm 72:1-7, 18-19, Romans 15:4-13, and Matthew 3:1-12.

Depiction of the Tree of Jesse

My Take:

Isaiah 11 is one of my favorite passages in the Hebrew Scriptures – it is prophetic in every sense of the word. It is dense in meaning and rich in image, but most importantly it is a powerful vision into God’s intentions for the world. Many Christians see this passage pertaining to Jesus Christ, a descendent of Jesse. I agree, if it is assumed that the final vision of peace and universal understanding of the Lord has yet to be actualized.

In Isaiah 11, I see an outline of sort (I have taken some interpretational liberties):

• A leader will arise from the lineage of Jesse and David (“A shoot will come up from the stump of Jesse; from his roots a branch will bear fruit” Isaiah 11.1).
• He will be ordained by God in his ministry, endowed with great wisdom and insight (Isaiah 11.2-3).
• His message will be extremely powerful (“He will strike the earth with the rod of his mouth”), and the message will advocate for the poor and slay the wicked.
• He will usher in an era of profound peace (Isaiah 11.6-8, described in poetic detail) where the “wolf will live with the lamb.”
• The Lord will be known universally, and the faith will be open to all people (Isaiah 11.9-10).

With one reservation, I feel as though Christ has accomplished – or set the stage – for the things in this outline. He was a descendant of Jesse, and upon Christ’s baptism the Spirit of the Lord “descended upon him like a dove.” His profound message of love and peace has inspired good will and charity to the poor. My one reservation is found in Isaiah 11.4: “With the breath of his lips he will slay the wicked.” My understanding of Christ is one of a pacifist – the man who chastised Peter for injuring the Roman soldier sent to arrest Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane; the savior who sacrificed himself, forgiving his tormenters on the cross. His message preached forgiveness for the wicked and an opportunity to repent, not death or retribution.

Many say that this aspect of the Messiah – the dispenser of justice – will be fulfilled upon Christ’s second coming. It’s not called Judgment Day arbitrarily. Many of these same people say that it is only after this Judgment Day that the vision of peace where the “wolf lives with the lamb,” can actualize. This may be true, but I think Christ challenges us to rethink justice and peace, and transformed their meaning in many ways. True justice is freedom from wickedness, and Christ provides redemption for all of our imperfections. The chains of sin and death are broken by Christ, and in that liberation there is true peace.

Instead of “slaying the wicked” Christ was slain on behalf of the wicked. Just like Christ’s execution literally freed Barabbas from death row, spiritually we are all sprung from our jail cells of sin. But since the message of Jesus Christ gives “the wicked” a chance at rebirth and renewal, it does “slay wickedness,” in a very metaphorical sense.

There is a lot in this Isaiah passage, and I find it interesting what Paul focuses on and cites in today’s lection from Romans. Paul uses Isaiah 11.10 to explain and justify his ministry to the Gentiles. His translation is different than most standard translations, but still recognizable: “The Root of Jesse will spring up, one who will arise to rule over the nations; the Gentiles will hope in him” (Romans 15.12). Paul sees Christ as an open invitation to all people to “glorify God for His mercy” (Rm 15.9) and encourages us to “Accept one another, then, just as Christ has accepted you” (Rm 15.7). Christ opened the Jewish faith, traditionally associated with an ethnic group of people, to all races and cultures across the world.

In Paul’s time, the first generation of Christians, this particularly applied to the Greeks and the Romans. Pre-Rabbinic Judaism was not only struggling with its role in an expanding world that did not share its religious tradition, but also being under the rule of the greatest military force the world had known. It was also confronted with a highly imperialist culture that actively exported its language, education and customs. Passages from the scriptures that assured that “the earth will be full of the knowledge of the Lord as waters cover the sea” (Isaiah 11.9) must have been a source of inspiration and assurance during this time where their land and culture was being occupied by the Romans.

Paul saw Christ as a way of bringing the God of Israel to the Roman world, and making the “Root of Jesse” a “banner for all people.” I wonder if Paul ever imagined, during one of his many trials or in a jail cell, that four hundred years later a Roman Emperor would convert to Christianity, or that 2,000 years later his words would survive to the information age. Today, knowledge of the Lord – or at least the Scriptures – is accessible at every corner of the earth in any language.

Sunday Dec. 2 -- Liturgical New Year

Passages:

Isaiah 2.1-5, Psalm 122, Romans 13.11-14, and Matthew 24.36-44. I will be dealing primarily with Isaiah and Romans.

My Take:

The first Sunday of Advent is the beginning of the liturgical calendar, so it is a sort of liturgical New Year’s Day. New Year’s is one of my favorite holidays because it is both reflective and forward-thinking. It anticipates the coming year, and puts forward resolutions. It’s fitting then that our lections for this week deal with prophecies for the future, and with regard to the New Testament lections, the second coming.

The second coming has always been the part of the New Testament that I struggle with most. Passages like Romans 13.11-14 have even affected my attitude toward Paul and the Epistles. It can be gathered from his writings that Paul believed that Christ would return in his lifetime to pass judgment and establish a new era. In this passage, Paul writes, “it is now the moment for you to wake from sleep. For salvation is nearer to us now than when we became believers; the night is far gone, the day is near.” The tone of this passage is one of impending collective judgment. This is not a personal passage – that as mortals each of our times are near – but one that has the presupposition that the entire world will face judgment soon. Seeing this assumption in his words 2,000 years later naturally casts doubt on his message.

His false belief that Christ’s historical return would happen soon affected a lot of Paul’s message, particularly his attitude toward children and marriage. Paul had almost nothing to say about children and their role in the Christian community and his attitude about marriage was that it is better to stay celibate (like him), but if you cannot control your urges, marriage is preferable to immorality (1 Corinthians 7.1-7). To Paul, there was little value in long term planning for the church and instituting how Christ’s message would be passed through the generations – it was important to get things right now, immediately, before it’s too late.

However, this opinion of Paul made too easy for me to dismiss the parts of his message I struggled with. I enjoy life – even through the roughest of times, I have always been thankful for the gift of life that God has afforded to me. It is not comforting to think the Apocolypse is right around the corner; or that this era would be wiped away “like a thief in the night” as the Matthew lection describes.

I prefer the message in Isaiah – the Kingdom of the Lord will be established slowly by obedience to God’s will. When we make God our highest priority (“established as the highest of mountains”) the world will begin a transformation where instruction flows forth from Zion and is accepted around the world – or, in New Testament terms, disciples are made of all nations. Isaiah’s vision of peace is promising, especially in a time of global warfare and strife: “they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.”

I think Isaiah’s message resonates stronger with many modern Christians because of their ability to influence society, and their missionary and activist spirit. In the 2,000 years since Christ’s sacrifice, the Christian community has had a long time to establish, formulate and grow the church. It now has a great deal of global influence, and it seems more optimistic to believe the church will play an active role in bringing about God’s kingdom than Christ suddenly returning on a cloud of glory and wiping the current society away.

Because of the “Left Behind” series, Christian movements that anticipate and fantasize about the Apocalypse have been put into the spotlight. Throughout Christian history there have been brothers and sisters who believe that their lifetime will see the Second Coming. And not to overly generalize, but they tend to be very dissatisfied with the spiritual state of the world. I mean, it stands to reason that if you pray for Christ to come, right now, and establish a new world, you must not like the current one very much.

Because I hope to have a long life serving God and helping better society, I’m partial to the lection of Isaiah. But, it’s important for me – as a Christian – to take the words of Paul and Matthew seriously. Judgment could be tomorrow, for all I know. This resonates on a personal level more than a cosmic level – I could die crossing the street. These really could be the last days of my life, and I shouldn’t take the future for granted.

With respect to personal action, Isaiah and Paul’s visions for the future are not as contradictory as they seem. The manner in which “Kingdom of God” is made manifest may be different, but the mandate to the individual is the same – obedience to God. If I work toward the peace in Isaiah, I will be ready for the judgment in Paul. Perhaps I will have a long life where I am afforded the social power to positively impact the world and “beat swords into plowshares,” or perhaps my end is around the corner, and “the day is near.” Either way, the message remains the same: “Let us then lay aside the works of darkness and put on the armor of light” (Romans 13.12) and “come, let us walk in the light of the LORD” (Isaiah 2.5).

Blog Introduction

This blog is intended to be a resource for all types of people seeking insight and exegesis into the week's Lectionary texts. I will post about one or more of the selected passages a week, with an emphasis on the ways the scriptures foster positive Christian practice and devotion. I hope this blog can serve as a resource for both lay people studying the Bible and for preachers/teachers preparing sermons or studies on the Lectionary. I intend to work two weeks or so ahead of the lectionary schedule, so that the following weeks scriptures will be available for people.

The Massachusetts Bible Society is "dedicated to biblical message of redemptive Hope, Compassion and Justice." It was the third Bible Society in the United States (following the Philadelphia Bible Society and Connecticut Bible Society) and was originally formed to disseminate religious texts and to aid the public in religious education. The methods of serving this mission have changed over two centuries (the horse drawn carriage handing out free Bibles is no longer in service...), but MBS remains an ecumenical organization dedicated to religious literacy. This lectionary resource hopes to serve that mission.

Comments are highly encouraged to help me tailor these posts to my audience. I am also available through email if you desire clarification or have additional questions. I intend on using the Revised Common Lectionary to select the weekly texts, and to work primarily with the New Revised Standard Version English translation. I will also consult the New International Version and the original Greek (for NT selections), but will only raise issues of translation if highly relevant or remotely interesting.

Thank you for reading this blog, and I pray you find it interesting and informative.

Peace.